Legal Opinion

Menees v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 1985No. 13950PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Chief Judge.

Movant filed a motion under Rule 27.26 seeking to vacate convictions of burglary and stealing following pleas of guilty. After an evidentiary hearing the trial court made detailed findings and denied the motion.

On appeal movant contends that the trial court erred in finding that his guilty pleas were knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily entered, because the evidence established that movant entered the pleas through coercion caused by fear of being represented by inadequate counsel.

Other than movant’s testimony there is no indication of the coercion claimed. At the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Trimble v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Mansfield v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Howard v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Reeves v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Stock v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API