Legal Opinion

Scott v. Winningham

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 29, 1887PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Lunatics. Service. Guardian and Ward. Process. Before Judge Richard H. Clark. Dekalb Superior Court. March Term, 1887. * Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Blandford, Justice.

In this case, L. J. Winn became indebted to Winning-ham, and gave his note. Winn was afterwards adjudged a lunatic, and George B. Scott was appointed his guardian. Winningham brought his action upon the note in the superior court of Dekalb county. The declaration set out the note, alleged that Winn had made it, that he had been adjudged a lunatic, that Scott had been appointed his guardian, and prayed process against Scott, the guardian. No process was prayed against Winn. Service of the declaration and process was made upon Scott, the guardian; no service was made upon…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Field & Adams v. LucasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1857

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Elliott v. KeithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Stanfield v. HurseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  3. Almond v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  4. Mason v. Royal Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  5. White v. GlasgowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API