Legal Opinion

Szvitih v. Doernte

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1948No. Appeal, 141PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Patterson,

Charles Szvitih, appellant, instituted this action in trespass against Harry Doernte, appellee, to recover damages for injuries sustained by him when the automobile in which he was a guest, operated by William A. Zundel, additional defendant and appellee, and a motor bus owned by Doernte and operated by his agent, skidded and collided as they approached each other on an icy curve. A jury returned a verdict in favor of Doernte and Zundel. Appellant’s motion for a new trial was denied and judgment entered on the verdict. This appeal followed.

Appellant, Charles…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bertinelli v. GaloniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Griffith v. v. A. Simrell & Son Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Luderer v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Eisenhower v. Hall's Motor Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Highway Express Lines, Inc. v. General Baking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Lasek v. JaroschakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Richardson v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Richardson v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API