Cox v. Thornton Associates, Inc.
Massachusetts Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtNeel, J.
Defendant Thornton Associates, Inc. (“Thornton”) moves to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Thornton argues that plaintiff Arthur Cox’s (“Cox”) causes of action, which are based on an oral contract, are barred by the Statute of Frauds. Cox contends that his reliance on that oral contract estops Thornton from asserting the Statute of Frauds as a defense. For the following reasons, Thornton’s motion to dismiss is allowed in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
For purposes of this decision, the Court accepts the factual allegations of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Nader v. CitronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Whitinsville Plaza, Inc. v. KotseasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Eyal v. Helen Broadcasting Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Charbonnier v. AmicoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- North East Technical Sales, Inc. v. BarshadMassachusetts Superior Court · 2000
- State Tax Auditing & Research, Inc. v. Waters Corp.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2000