Katz & Barnett v. Gill
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL from the Third District Court, Parish of Claiborne. Barksdale, J.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Breaux, J.
Plaintiffs’ claim in this case does not exceed $2000.
Unless the' transactions assailed by him are pure simulations, it is manifest that the appellate jurisdiction is tested by the amount of plaintiffs’ demand, and not by the value of the property involved in the contract sought to be annulled.
Our opinion, in the case of Chaffe vs. Gill, just read,'shows that the contract assailed was not a mere simulation.
*1042Ib follows that plaintiffs must seek appellate relief in another tribunal.
It is, therefore, ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed,…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Cusachs v. DugueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
- Courtney v. RigmaidenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
- Day v. Helena Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
- First Nat. Bank of Ruston v. JonesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
- Advance Thresher Co. v. BreauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.