Legal Opinion
JACKSON v. MILLER
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 5, 2024No. 2:21-cv-09404Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ANTHONY MAURICE JACKSON, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:21-cv-09404 (BRM) v. OPINION DR. SCOTT MILLER, et al., Defendants. MARTINOTTI, DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Barrington Lynch, M.D. (“Lynch”) and Alejandrina Sumicad, APN (“Sumicad”) (collectively, “Defendants”) seeking to dismiss Anthony Maurice Jackson’s (“Plaintiff”) state law medical malpractice/negligence claims against them pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c) for failure to comply with…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Robin Chamberlain v. Vincent C. Giampapa, M.D., Individually and Dba Plastic Surgery Center InternationaleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Ridgewood Board of Education v. N.E., as Guardian Ad Litem for M.E., an Infant Mary E., Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for M.E., an Infant, Defendants/third-Party v. Frederick Stokley, Superintendent John Campion, Director of Special Programs Charles Abate, Principal William Ward, Principal Lorraine Zak, Psychologist Kathleen McNally Social Worker Caroline Janover, Ldt-C George Neville, Principal Henry Hogue, Psychologist June Ann Dibb, Dr., Psychiatrist Joan Christian, Ldt-C Susan Lynaugh, Psychologist, Third-Party N.E., as Guardian Ad Litem for M.E., an Infant Mary E., Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for M.E., an InfantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.