Legal Opinion · Dissent

Waddy v. City of Houston

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided July 2, 1992No. 01-90-00738-CVPublished

1DissentWilson, Justice

I agree with the majority that Waddy asserted a cause of action based on the theory of inverse condemnation in his plaintiff’s original petition. I further agree that the right to maintain such a cause of action is lost after the expiration of the 10-year period necessary to acquire land by adverse possession. Because I do not agree with the majority’s application of the 10-year statute to the facts in this case, I respectfully dissent.

The majority states that it is uncontested the sewer line was installed in 1919, and that the statute of limitations started running for an inverse…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hudson v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Eastham v. GibbsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. Hickman v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Black v. Terry CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  5. HL Brown and Associates, Inc. v. McMahonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API