Waddy v. City of Houston
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1DissentWilson, Justice
I agree with the majority that Waddy asserted a cause of action based on the theory of inverse condemnation in his plaintiff’s original petition. I further agree that the right to maintain such a cause of action is lost after the expiration of the 10-year period necessary to acquire land by adverse possession. Because I do not agree with the majority’s application of the 10-year statute to the facts in this case, I respectfully dissent.
The majority states that it is uncontested the sewer line was installed in 1919, and that the statute of limitations started running for an inverse…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hudson v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Eastham v. GibbsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Hickman v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Black v. Terry CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- HL Brown and Associates, Inc. v. McMahonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.