Legal Opinion

Wylie v. State Board of Equalization

District Court, S.D. California

Decided December 14, 1937No. 1302-YPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YANKWICH, District Judge.

In the above matter an interlocutory injunction is sought to be heard by a three-judge court, as provided by section 266 of the Judicial Code, as amended, 28 U.S. C.A. § 380. Pending the determination of the application for an interlocutory injunction, a temporary restraining order is asked for.

The bill of complaint is brought, for themselves and others similarly situated, by a citizen of California and a citizen of Rhode Island against the members of the California State Board of Equalization to stay the enforcement of the provisions relating to the licensing of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Thurlow v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
  4. Levering & Garrigues Co. v. MorrinSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Salem Trust Co. v. Manufacturers' Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Acret v. HarwoodDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1941
  2. Voege v. AMERICAN SUMATRA TOBACCO CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1961
  3. Blue & Gold Stamps-U-Save Premium Co. v. SobieskiDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1961
  4. Rok v. LeggDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1939
  5. American Travelers Club, Inc. v. HostetterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API