Sellman v. Department of Natural Resources
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
O’Hara and D. E. Holbrook, Jr., JJ.
(concurring in result). Judge Holbrook and I concur in the result reached by Judge Danhof but we feel obligated to record certain reservations. While we reach the same result we arrive at it for a different reason. These reservations arise not so much out of our colleague’s opinion as out of the practical problems posed by the fact that lake trout don’t read very well. It is impossible to affix a sign to gill nets: "No Lake Trout Allowed”. We also feel obligated to include certain observations which might mandate a contrary conclusion under other…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Aikens v. Department of ConservationMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Beger v. Industrial Painting Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1967
3Cited by1 opinion
- Grunow v. SandersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978