State v. Hunter
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Justice.
After a careful consideration of all assignments of error argued in defendants’ briefs, we conclude that there is no merit in any assignment, that defendants received a fair trial and that the judgments entered are according to law. We will discuss briefly the questions raised by each defendant.
Appeal Of Defendant Barrios
By his sole assignment of error, defendant Barrios contends the trial court erred in permitting S.B.I. Agent Frank Johnson to testify with respect to a pretrial statement made to him by defendant Lattimer.
It appears that this evidence is challenged for the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. PeeleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. BiggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. SilhanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. AsheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. LucasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.