Legal Opinion

Kathryne L. Carmody v. Secretary of the Navy, and Martin D. Carmody

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 27, 1989No. 88-3628PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPENCER, District Judge:

Kathryne C. Carmody appeals the district court’s ruling that she is not entitled to avail herself of the direct payment provision of the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act, 10 U.S.C. § 1408 (1985 & Supp.1989) (the “USFSPA” or the “Act”). For the reasons stated below, we affirm the district court’s ruling.

I

Kathryne C. Carmody and Martin D. Car-mody were married in 1942. On October 1, 1965, a California court entered a final decree of divorce which was silent with respect to the disposition of Mr. Carmody’s military retirement benefits. In March, 1983,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Mansell v. MansellSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Henn v. HennCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Casas v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. In Re Marriage of CobbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Honeycutt v. Tour Carriage, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1996
  2. Bullis v. BullisCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1995
  3. Endsley v. Endsley (In Re Endsley)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1996
  4. Mosier v. MosierIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Mosier v. MosierIdaho Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API