Mosier v. Mosier
Idaho Supreme Court
1DissentBistline, Justice
It could not be more apparent to this Justice that Hannelore Mosier deserves to share in her ex-husband’s military retirement benefits which accrued during the time the two were married. As the majority opinion correctly points out, I.C. § 32-713A was enacted “to alleviate the inequities experienced by those individuals caught between the issuance of McCarty and the effective date of 10 U.S.C. § 1408,”1 the statute which returned to the states the power to treat military retirement benefits in accordance with state law. Accordingly, this Court should interpret the statute to alleviate the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Busby v. BusbyTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- Archer v. Shields Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1967
- Southern v. Glenn, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984
- Bates v. Capital State BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
- Kathryne L. Carmody v. Secretary of the Navy, and Martin D. CarmodyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.