Legal Opinion

Warren v. Hooper

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 26, 2007No. 1050285Published

1Opinion of the Court

984 So.2d 1118 (2007)

Howard Michael WARREN

v.

John Scott HOOPER.

1050285.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

October 26, 2007.

Robert J. Russell, Jr., of Parnell & Crum, P.A., Montgomery, for appellant.

J. Scott Hooper, pro se.

BOLIN, Justice.

Howard Michael Warren appeals from a summary judgment in favor of the defendant, John Scott Hooper. We reverse and remand.

I. Factual Background

The facts that can be gleaned from the record on appeal are meager; however, the documents submitted by Hooper, the admissions in his answer, and the affidavits of Warren, Hooper, and David Eason, who is not a party to this case,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Bussey v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Liberty Nat. v. Univ. of Ala. Health Servs.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API