Legal Opinion
MTI Insulated Products, Incorp v. Davis H. Elliot Company, Incor
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 29, 2013No. 12-2673PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STADTMUELLER, District Judge.
On June 19, 2000, Samuel Large was injured while operating a bucket truck, which his employer, Davis H. Elliot Company (Elliot) had leased from TECO, Inc. (TECO), the manufacturer of the truck. Mr. Large thereafter sued TECO; TECO’s successor-in-interest, appellee Mobile Tool, Inc. (Mobile); and several other related parties. Mobile then filed a third-party complaint against Elliot, seeking defense and indemnification against Mr. Large’s complaint, pursuant to the lease contract between Elliot and TECO, which Mobile had assumed by purchasing TECO and its assets.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Frank Thomas v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Ames v. American National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
- Eby v. York-Division, Borg-WarnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Blumenstock v. GibsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kuhne v. Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- EDGE MATERIALS, LLC v. STERLING CONCRETE EQUIPMENT, INC.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2025
- Janusz Zastawnik v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024
- Jeffrey Kuhne v. Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Latitude Service Company v. ReeseDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.