Legal Opinion

Janusz Zastawnik v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided September 20, 2024No. 3:23-cv-00577Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION JANUSZ ZASTAWNIK, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:23-CV-577-CCB THOR MOTOR COACH INC, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff Janusz Zastawnik’s fully briefed Motion for Application of California Substantive Law to the Case. [DE 40]. Based on the applicable law, facts, and arguments, Mr. Zastawnik’s motion is granted, and California substantive law will be applied to all his claims. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND Mr. Zastawnik bought a recreational vehicle (“RV”) in California in May 2022. The RV was…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Scarano v. Central R. Co. Of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  5. In the Matter of Thomas v. Cassidy, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API