Legal Opinion

Baum v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 5, 1927No. C-208PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

The allegations and proof are reviewed in the opinion.

2Opinion of the Court · CampbellCampbell, Chief Justice

The petition alleges that the W. & T. Allen Co., in September, 1918, made a bid to manufacture 120,000 pairs of woolen trousers at 80 cents per pair, inclosing the bid in a letter addressed to the office of the Quartermaster General in New York; that on October 8, 1918, “ the Government wrote the contractor ” asking what his bid would be if the material was cut and delivered by the Government, to which inquiry no reply was made, and that during October the War De~ *324partment awarded a contract to the contractor for trousers “ at 75 cents, in…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. United States Bedding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1920

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Coconut Plantations Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
  2. Purity Cross v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  3. Rosenfield v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API