Legal Opinion

Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 9, 1923No. 208PublishedCited by 19 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims dis- • missing a petition on demurrer.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sanford

The Railroad Company filed its petition in the Court of Claims asking judgment for the amount of certain “ extraordinary expenses ” which it claimed to have incurred in constructing a branch railroad to the Ordnance Depot at Curtis Bay, Maryland, under “ an informal or implied agreement ” with officers of the War Department for the reimbursement of such expenses by "the United States. The Dent Act, March 2, 1919, c. 94, 40 Stat. 1272. A demurrer to this petition was sustained. 56 Ct. Clms.. 377

The Allegations of the petition setting forth specifically “ the nature, terms and conditions ” of…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. Amos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Merritt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Nelson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  4. First National Bank of Emlenton, Pennsylvania v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
  5. Hughes Transp., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API