Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bruno’s Food Stores, Inc. v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 9, 1997No. A97A1395Published

1ConcurrenceBirdsong, Presiding Judge

Although I agree the trial court properly denied FoodMax’s motion for summary judgment, I write separately because I cannot agree with the analysis the majority used in reaching that result. In my view, the majority misconstrues and misapplies our law concerning summary judgment, inferences, active negligence, and distractions.

1. Because Taylor slipped on water intentionally placed on the floor by FoodMax’s cleaning company, consideration of the Alterman Foods foreign substance analysis is unwarranted (see Alterman Foods v. Ligon, 246 Ga. 620, 623-624 (272 SE2d 327)), and FoodMax’s arguments…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  3. Alterman Foods, Inc. v. LigonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  4. Holland v. Sanfax CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  5. Summer-Minter & Associates, Inc. v. GiordanoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API