Legal Opinion

In Re Burnette

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 3, 1939No. Crim. 2101PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PETERS, J., pro teto. —

Burnette petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus for the purpose of having his bail reduced pending appeal from his conviction of the crime of rape. The petition and return, together with certain supporting affidavits, and the records of this court, disclose that; after the conviction, the trial court refused appellant a cer tifieate of probable cause. Thereafter, upon the petition of Burnette, this court granted a writ of sv/persedeas to stay execution pending the appeal. (People v. Burnette, 34 Cal. App. (2d) 663 [94 Pac. (2d) 399].) The present petition…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex parte TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Ex parte SmallmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Ex parte SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. In Re PantagesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. People v. BurnetteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re BrumbackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. GilliamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. People v. BurnetteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Gusick v. BoiesArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  5. People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API