Legal Opinion

Ex parte Smallman

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1879No. 10,461PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Application on habeas corpus to be admitted to bail.

1Opinion of the Court

Wallace, C. J.:

The prisoners, having been convicted of the crime of grand larceny, and having taken an appeal to the Supreme Court from *36the judgment of conviction, and from an order of the Municipal Criminal Court denying their motion for a new trial, make their application to be admitted to bail pending their appeal.

1. It is settled here that a person convicted of a felony of this grade is to be admitted to bail, or bail refused, as a matter of discretion merely. (Ex parte Voll, 41 Cal. 30.) This is the admitted doctrine of that case, and if it is to be overruled it should be overruled by…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re PodestoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Ex parte BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. In Re BrumbackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. In re SchriberIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  5. United States v. HudsonDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1894

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API