Legal Opinion

Waldrop v. Holland

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 4, 1979No. 2598-3PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action against the defendants Holland to recover upon two causes of action: (1) an unpaid account for well drilling, and (2) damages resulting from defendants' alleged breach of a lease. Defendants appeal from judgments entered against them upon each cause of action.

Two questions are presented: (1) As a matter of law, does a partnership assume an antecedent loan obtained by one of the partners to purchase equipment later transferred to the partnership? and (2) Was the summary judgment for damages for breach of the lease agreement properly entered?

The first question…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Leckie v. BennettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. In re GinsbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robeson v. HellandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  2. Johnson v. SlusserCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  3. Robeson v. HellandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API