Legal Opinion

In re Ginsberg

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 1, 1955No. 11380PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARIS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court dismissing a petition to re*473view the action of a referee denying the appellants, Stanley and Henry Ginsberg, their discharge in bankruptcy. The appellants had been adjudicated bankrupts both individually and as copartners trading as Hensten Appliance Co. The referee’s action denying the appellants’ discharge was based on his conclusion that they had obtained money or property on credit by making materially false statements in writing respecting their financial condition. Under section 14, sub. c(3) of the Bankruptcy…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Francis v. McNealSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Liberty Nat. Bank of Roanoke, Va. v. BearSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Myers v. International Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Strause v. HooperDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1901
  5. Morrison v. CurrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bank Center, Ltd. v. Papariella (In Re Bank Center, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Waldrop v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  3. In re RubinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Arthus Bertrand, S.A. v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  5. Greenman Corporate Consultants, Inc. v. Palacio Del Mar, Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API