Legal Opinion

Herbert Leo Bushaw v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 17, 1965No. 19481_1PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOLOMON, District Judge:

Appellant, Herbert Leo Bushaw, was indicted and convicted by a jury of attempted bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a).

In this appeal, Bushaw contends that the evidence was insufficient to sustain a conviction and that the trial court erred in permitting the government to introduce in evidence inadmissible and prejudicial statements, under the guise of impeaching its own witness. For the reasons hereafter stated, we find no reversible error.

On February 7, 1964, an attempt was made to rob a branch of the Bank of America located in the Springdale Shopping…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  3. Kuhn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
  4. Bateman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. Willie H. DennisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  2. United States v. George Samuel Walter RogersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  3. Jesse James Gilbert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  4. United States v. Peter InsanaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  5. Warfield Milo Goings v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API