Legal Opinion
Bateman v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 15, 1954No. 13825PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Circuit Judge.
The appellants, Charles and Wallace Bateman, are brothers. Their counsel attempt to depict them as two ignorant, unsuspecting individuals, victims of a misplaced trust in the integrity and ability of an incompetent and drunken accountant. In order not to be misled by the doleful picture presented, we need keep in mind that appellants possessed the ability to amass a fortune within a few years by the exercise of a business acumen and foresight which establishes beyond question that intellects engineering such success must be charged with a perception keen enough to detect an…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. StoehrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Remmer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Shotwell Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Lesly Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Meyer Harris Cohen, AKA Michael 'Mickey' Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Turf Center, Inc., Allen, A. Goldberg, Milton Hyatt and Myer Mayor Fox v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.