Legal Opinion

Duff v. Eichler

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 7, 1935PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant filed his second amended petition in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Missouri, seeking to recover damages in the sum of $15,000 for personal injuries, alleged to have been sustained as the result of the negligence of respondent. The trial court sustained respondent's demurrer to the petition. Appellant declined to plead further and judgment was entered against him, whereupon he appealed.

Since the sufficiency of the petition is the sole question for our determination we will quote it insofar as material to the issue. It reads:

"Plaintiff states all the following, to-wit:
"1.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Glaser v. RothschildSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. Roman v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  3. Vogt v. WurmbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  4. Gallagher v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  5. Herdt v. KoenigMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brandt v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  2. Darlington v. Railway Exchange Building, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  3. Lahtinen v. Continental Building Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  4. Coplen v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  5. Edwards v. EB Murray & CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API