Legal Opinion

Lahtinen v. Continental Building Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 2, 1936PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

* NOTE: Opinion filed at May Term, 1936, July 2, 1936; motion for rehearing filed; motion overruled at September Term, October 2, 1936. Respondent Amelia Lahtinen recovered a judgment against appellant Continental Building Company for $25,000 for personal injuries received by her because of the alleged fault of appellant. The principal question presented is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. The facts pertinent to the determination of that issue follow.

Appellant is the owner of what is known as the Kansas City Athletic Club building, a twenty-two story structure located…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cullings v. GoetzNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Doyle v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Walsh v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  4. Anderson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  5. Kohnle v. PaxtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Wolfmeyer v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  2. Houfburg v. Kansas City Stock Yards Co. of MaineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  3. Lemm v. GouldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  4. Sinclair Refining Co. v. StevensCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  5. Warner v. FrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1950

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API