Legal Opinion

E. B. Piekenbrock & Sons v. Knoer

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 12, 1907PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from Palo Alto District Court. — IioN. W. B. Quar-toN, Judge. ActioN in equity in .the nature of a creditor’s bill, demurrer to petition sustained, and plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, C. J.

In .the year 1894, the defendant J. J. Knoer, being engaged in business as a retail merchant,at Whittemore, Kossuth county, Iowa, became indebted to the plaintiffs for a bill of goods. Payment not being made, plaintiffs brought suit upon their demand in the district court of Kossuth county, and on May 22, 1894, obtained judgment thereon, which is still unpaid. The present action was instituted October 23, 1902, but the substituted petition, the sufficiency of which we are now to consider, was filed November 14, 1903. This action is brought in equity to subject to the payment of said judgment…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mickel v. WalravenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  2. Gebhard v. SattlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
  3. Meyer v. MeyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  4. Butterfield v. WicksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  5. Laird v. KilbourneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Rathje v. Mercy HospitalSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  2. Watrous v. WatrousSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. Robertson v. SchardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  4. Rock v. WarhankSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  5. Van Veen v. Van VeenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API