Legal Opinion

Bryant v. Eagan

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 16, 1988No. 8721SC735PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs’ sole contention on appeal is the trial court erred in granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment. It is a fun*744damental principle of law that summary judgment should be granted only when the materials submitted to the court establish that there is no genuine issue as to a material fact and that a party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Parker Marking Systems, Inc. v. Diagraph-Bradley Industries, Inc., 80 N.C. App. 177, 341 S.E. 2d 92 (1986). The party moving for a summary judgment has the burden of clearly establishing the lack of any triable…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Watts v. Cumberland County Hospital System, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Watts v. Cumberland County Hospital System, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Brown v. North Carolina Wesleyan College, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Rockingham Square Shopping Center, Inc. v. Integon Life Insurance Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Henderson v. LeBauerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Driggers v. Sofamor, S.N.C.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1999
  3. Russell v. RussellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API