Legal Opinion
Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 15, 1992No. Nos. 91-35324, 91-35338PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRIS, Circuit Judge:
The facts are set forth in our prior opinion in this matter. See Bell Helicopter v. United States, 833 F.2d 1375, 1376-77 (9th Cir.1987). On remand, the district court held that: (1) Bell’s, Sea Airmotive’s, and Gay Airways’ implied contractual indemnity and noncontractual indemnity claims are barred by the Alaska Workers’ Compensation Act and (2) Sea Airmotive’s and Gay Airways’ express contractual indemnity claims are not similarly barred but have not been properly raised. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. v. United States, 755 F.Supp. 269 (D.Alaska 1990). We have…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lake v. Construction MacHinery, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Koehring Manufacturing Co. v. Earthmovers of Fairbanks, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Providence Washington Insurance Co. v. DeHavilland Aircraft Co. of CanadaAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Bell Helicopter, and Sea Airmotive, Inc. Gay Airways, Inc. A.E. Gay, Inc. A.E. Gay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1990
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bet Plant Services, Inc. v. W.D. Robinson Electric Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1996
- Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. v. United States of America, Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., and Sea Airmotive, Inc., Gay Airways, Inc., A.E. Gay, Inc., and A.E. Gay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992