Legal Opinion

State Of Washington v. Sandra Jessie Himmelman

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 5, 2014No. 69797-8Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 69797-8-1 Respondent, DIVISION ONE v. UNPUBLISHED OPINION SANDRA JESSIE HIMMELMAN, Appellant. FILED: May 5, 2014 Schindler, J. — In a prosecution for forgery and identity theft, the court properly instructed the jurythat it is permitted but not required to find that the defendant had knowledge ifthe juryfinds the defendant had information which would lead a reasonable person in the same situation to believe the relevant facts exist. We affirm. FACTS On June 27, 2010, Carolyn Rygg's checkbook was stolen from her car.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. EmeryWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Keller v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API