Legal Opinion

Wyoming Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Smith

District Court, D. Montana

Decided October 25, 1966No. Civ. No. 1120PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*871OPINION

RUSSELL E. SMITH, District Judge.

This action for a declaratory judgment is brought by the plaintiff (called the Company) to determine its liability to the defendants for losses which the defendants suffered as the result of a hostile fire. Defendants (called the Smiths) counterclaimed, claiming that the Company had insured them against loss by fire and praying for damages in the amount of $20,000.00. The case was tried to a jury. At the close of the evidence it appeared to the court that there were but two fact questions. Those questions were submitted to the jury and were answered.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Greening v. Gazette Printing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Mayfield v. Montana Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miller v. WalterMontana Supreme Court · 1974
  2. L.R. Bretz v. Portland General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. Wyoming Farm Bureau Mutual Ins. Co., a Corp. v. Curtis L. Smith and Jamie L. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  4. Kent v. ASSOCIATION LIFE INSURANCE COSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  5. L.R. Bretz v. Portland General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API