L.R. Bretz v. Portland General Electric Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge:
We consider again the validity of Sam Goldwyn’s aphorism that an oral contract isn’t worth the paper it’s written on. L.R. Bretz, a Montana resident, brought a diversity suit against Portland General Electric (PGE), an Oregon corporation, for breach of a contract for the sale of PGE’s stock in its wholly-owned subsidiary, the Beartooth Coal Company. The district court granted PGE’s motion for summary judgment, holding that the exchange of letters between Bretz and PGE did not satisfy Montana’s statute of frauds.1 We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- David D. Darring v. Larry Kincheloe, Superintendent of the Washington State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Fiers v. JacobsonMontana Supreme Court · 1949
- Johnson v. ElliotMontana Supreme Court · 1950
- Dineen v. SullivanMontana Supreme Court · 1949
- Johnson v. OgleMontana Supreme Court · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gregory Glass v. Kemper CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Gray v. LackeDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1988
- Wieberg v. Resthaven Gardens of Memory, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
- L.R. Bretz v. Portland General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989