Legal Opinion

O'Neil v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 19, 1953No. 11368_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDGERTON, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Arthur B. O’Neil, a veteran of the First World War, had a skin allergy in 1949. Though his illness was not service connected, his war service entitled him under the World War Veterans’ Act, 1924, 38 U.S.C.A. § 421 et seq., 43 Stat. 607, to treatment in a Veterans’ Administration facility. 38 U.S.C.A. § 706, 49 Stat. 729. He accordingly entered a naval hospital. There he was given an overdose of epinephrine which caused a disabling cardiac condition. Because this disability resulted from hospitalization and treatment as a veteran he was entitled to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Brooks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Hitaffer v. Argonne Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  4. Johansen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Emerson v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Myers & Myers, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. Emil Zoula and Charles C. Sterling v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  3. Garrett v. Reno Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  4. Coastal Tank Lines, Inc. v. CanolesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Hoffman v. DautelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API