Legal Opinion

Exxon Co. v. Sofec, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 10, 1996No. 95-129PublishedCited by 132 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

In United States v. Reliable Transfer Co., 421 U. S. 397 (1975), we abandoned the “divided damages” rule previously applied to claims in admiralty for property damages, and adopted the comparative fault principle for allocating damages among parties responsible for an injury. In this case we affirm that the requirement of legal or “proximate” causation, and the related “superseding cause” doctrine, apply in admiralty notwithstanding our adoption of the comparative fault principle.

I

This case arises from the stranding of a tanker, the Exxon Houston, several hours after it broke away from a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. Reliable Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Italia Societa Rer Azioni Di Navigazione v. Oregon Stevedoring Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by132 opinions

  1. Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Staub v. Proctor HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Glossip v. GrossSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. Paroline v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API