Legal Opinion

Smith v. Boone

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1892No. 7440PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Ho statement is necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

STAYTON, Chief Justice.

— A grant of two leagues of school land made to Falls County is situated south of and contiguous to a grant made to James Carter, through whom appellee owns the southern part of the latter grant, but he has no paper title to any part of the grant made to Falls County.

Falls County caused the grant to it to be surveyed and subdivided into small tracts, and in doing this it appears that the surveyor established and marked as the north line of the grant to the county a line south of the true north line about 186 varas.

Appellant bought one of the subdivisions of the grant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. O'Farrel v. HarneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Marsh v. MitchellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Penry v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brooks v. SlaughterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. MacKintosh v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  3. Magee v. MerrimanTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  4. James v. HitchcockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  5. Morgan v. MowlesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API