Legal Opinion

State v. Pettigrew

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided August 3, 1993No. 14114, 14202 and 14229PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PICKARD, Judge.

In these consolidated appeals, Defendants Bannister, Pettigrew, and Turner raise issues related to their felony aggravated battery convictions pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 30-3-5(C) (Repl.Pamp.1984). Defendant Bannister raises the issue of whether the trial court erred in failing to give a jury instruction for simple battery pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 30-3-4 (Repl.Pamp.1984). Defendants Bannister and Turner raise the issue of whether there is sufficient evidence to sustain their convictions for felony aggravated battery. In addition, all three Defendants raise the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Matter of Adoption of DoeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. SutphinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. FishNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. MoraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Eddie Maes v. John Thomas, Warden and Attorney General of the State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  3. State v. FrazierNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. SotoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API