Legal Opinion

Kirsch v. PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES'RET. BD.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 11, 2008No. Petition 446 EAL 2007PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

AND NOW this 11th day of June, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioners, are:

1. Did the Commonwealth Court err by interpreting the “Leave for service with a collective bargaining organization” Section 8102 of the Retirement Code as preventing Petitioners from receiving full credit for the final average salaries they earned while serving as officers in a collective bargaining organization?

2. Did the Commonwealth Court err by holding that Petitioners’ salaries artificially enhanced or inflated their retirement benefits?

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Anderson v. AbrahamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kirsch v. Public School Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. Pennsylvania State Troopers Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Anderson v. AbrahamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Commonwealth v. Pennsylvania State Troopers Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Commonwealth v. Pennsylvania State Troopers Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009