Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Commonwealth v. Pennsylvania State Troopers Ass'n

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 18, 2009No. 105 C.D. 2009Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION BY

Judge PELLEGRINI.

The majority finds that a provision in an interest arbitration award allowing police officers released from duty to perform union duties shall be paid at the highest-ranking member of the bargaining unit with appropriate longevity is illegal because it purportedly will result in their receiving higher pensions.1 The majority bases that holding on Kirsch v. Public School Employees’ Retirement Board, 929 A.2d 663 (Pa.Cmwlth.2007), appeal granted, 597 Pa. 222, 951 A.2d 257 (2008), where we upheld a Public School Employees’ Retirement Board…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Borough of Nazareth v. Nazareth Borough Police Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Kirsch v. Public School Employees' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Kirsch v. PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES'RET. BD.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API