Legal Opinion

McLarty v. Abercrombie

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 12, 1929No. Nos. 7060, 7094PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

The questions arising on the motion to dismiss will be first discussed. In the cross-bill of exceptions it is complained that the court erred in not sustaining the “motion to dismiss” upon each and every ground. The questions as stated in *745the brief of counsel for defendants will be discussed seriatim. “Can a suit be maintained by a devisee under a will for the recovery of the property devised, without alleging an assent to the devise by the executor of said will ?” “All property, both real and personal, in this State, being assets to pay debts, no devise or legacy passes the title until the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lester v. StephensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Kramer v. SpradlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  3. Ezell v. MobleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  4. McClure Realty & Investment Co. v. EubanksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  5. Maneely v. SteeleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bowman v. BowmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  2. Turner v. Trust Company of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  3. Williford v. SwintSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  4. Moody v. McHanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  5. Field v. MednikowCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API