Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Wright

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1872PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Grant Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

This was an action by the appellees against the appellant upon a promissory note.

The defendant was duly brought into court by the service of a summons, and there was judgment against him by default. The note stipulated for the payment of attorney’s fees, if suit should be brought thereon, and it was averred in the complaint that the attorney’s fees were of the reasonable value of forty dollars. The j udgment was rendered for a little over *294ten dollars too much, adding the forty dollars, for attorney’s fees, to the principal and interest of the note. But there were no steps taken in the court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Skeen v. HuntingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Darlington v. WarnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Durbon v. ConnorIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Sturgis v. RodmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Searle v. WhippermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. American Insurance v. GibsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Tachau v. FiedeldeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Stumph v. BighamIndiana Superior Court · 1873
  5. Tachau v. FiedeldeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API