Legal Opinion

Stuart v. Tenison Bros. Saddlery Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 10, 1899PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Dallas. Tried below before Hon. W. J. J. Smith.

1Opinion of the Court

RAINEY, Associate Justice.

The following statement of the nature and result of the suit is taken from appellant’s brief:

"This was a suit by appellant against appellee to recover usurious interest and attorneys’ fees, alleged to have been wrongfully collected by appellee from appellant and paid under duress. It is not shown by the transcript of the record when the original petition was filed, but the original answer was filed on March 6, 1897.

"The amended original petition upon which the cause was tried was filed October 17, 1898, and alleges in substance: ‘That on September 30, 1891, Murphy &…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Presidio Mining Co. v. BullisTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Cornell v. BarnesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bomar v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  2. Ballard v. ShockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Edinburg Irr. Co. v. LedbetterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Great Southern Life Ins. Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Texas Cent. R. Co. v. DumasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API