Legal Opinion

The Medical Protective Company v. Donald Alexander Gronbeck, et al.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided June 22, 2026No. 3:24-cv-00292Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON THE MEDICAL PROTECTIVE : COMPANY, : : Case No. 3:24-cv-292 Plaintiff, : : Judge Thomas M. Rose v. : : Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry DONALD ALEXANDER : GRONBECK, et al., : : Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND DENYING, IN PART, MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AS TO DONALD ALEXANDER GRONBECK (DOC. NO. 79); DENYING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AS TO ALL DEFAULTING DEFENDANTS (DOC. NO. 75); AND, ISSUING…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. WingetCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  5. Doe v. ShafferOhio Supreme Court · 2000

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API