Legal Opinion

McLaughlin v. Rawn

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 1939No. 3113Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By BARNES, J.

The above-entitled cause is now being determined on plaintiff-appeilee’s motion to dismiss defendant’s appeal on questions of law for the following reasons, to-wit:

“(a) The Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction of the case because motion for new trial in common pleas court was not filed within time prescribed by law.
“(b) Notice of appeal was not perfected within time provided by law.
“(c) Other reasons apparent upon the record.”

*611We will take up these questions in order.

This Court has repeatedly held that failure to file motion for new trial within time, through which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Local Union No 413Ohio Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Cultice v. DeMaro Realty Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Norwood v. McDonaldOhio Court of Appeals · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API