Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Local Union No 413

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 1939No. 2914PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*365OPINION

BY THE COURT:

At the outset we are required to say that upon the authority of a recent holding made by this- court the appeal ■must be dismissed independent of either ground of the motion of appellees for the reason that the notice of appeal does not designate the order, judgment or decree appealed from. The notice is directed to,

"the order, judgment, and-decree of the Court of Common Pleas of the fourth day of April, 1938, wherein the court overruled the motion for new trial and directed final judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants.”

Obviously there was no…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cultice v. DeMaro Realty Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Showers v. Prudential InsOhio Court of Appeals · 1935

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Davish v. ArnOhio Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Hauck v. HauckOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. Covington Building & Loan Ass'n v. YostOhio Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. In Re Estate of LowryOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
  5. Haines v. PefferOhio Court of Appeals · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API