Legal Opinion

Ex parte Saenz

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 15, 2016No. WR-80,945-01PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · AlcalaAlcala, J.

This is an application for a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus. Tex.Code Crim. PR0C. art. 11.07. In an “amended”1 application, Heriberto Saenz, Applicant, challenges his convictions for murder and aggravated assault on the basis that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at his trial. In particular, Applicant contends that trial counsel failed to impeach one of the State’s witnesses, Jerry Gonzalez, with a prior inconsistent statement Gonzalez made in an interview with the police, and Applicant further contends that he was prejudiced as a result of counsel’s error. We filed…

3Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Bone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by49 opinions

  1. Ex parte SpeckmanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
  2. James Fulton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2019
  3. Charles Ray Carter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  4. Adrian Roosevelt McDaniel v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2016
  5. Alberto Montelongo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2018

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API