Legal Opinion
Griggs v. City of Macon
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided November 18, 1922No. 3178PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
The contention of counsel for the city, that the plaintiff had an ample remedy by certiorari to review the judgment of the recorder committing him to the city court of Macon to answer the offense of "running a disorderly house,” and adjudging him guilty of “ running a lewd house,” and to reverse these judgments, if erroneous, and that for this reason injunction will not lie, is not well rooted in the law. The judgment of the recorder, that ,the plaintiff be committed, or give bond to appear to answer in the city court the offense of keeping a disorderly…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Yates v. MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Gilman v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- City of Atlanta v. Gate City Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Erwin v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. LeonardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- City of Acworth v. Western & Atlantic RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Harris v. NorrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Forbes v. Mayor of SavannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Lewis v. City of SmyrnaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.