Hemlock 6400 Tire Co. v. McLemore
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss
*100Construction is invoked by this proceeding of section 15 of chapter 149, Acts of 1919, as amended by chapter 108, Acts 1923, by which registration of automobiles is-provided for and the fees fixed. It is insisted for the complainant, which operates an automobile tire business in Memphis, that the small cars used by it, particularly in emergency road work, are not subject to the tonnage charge applying under the act to “all motor trucks.” A stipulation of fact in the record describes the type of car in question, and its use-by the complainant. Therefrom it appears that the cars in question are…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Paltani v. Sentinel Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
- Gaumnitz v. Indemnity Insurance of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- State v. DuranMontana Supreme Court · 1953
- Life & Casualty Insurance v. CantrellTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
- Pollard v. StansellMississippi Supreme Court · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.