Legal Opinion

Paltani v. Sentinel Life Insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1931No. 27914PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This is an action by the beneficiary to recover under the terms of an insurance policy for accidental death of the insured. The insurance company appeals from a judgment.

The insured was instantly killed, while riding in or uppn an automobile, by being struck, run down or over by another automobile. The policy upon which this action is brought insures against losses and disabilities which result, exclusively of all other causes, from accidental bodily injuries sustained by the insured, which are sustained while operating, driving, riding in or on, demonstrating, adjusting or cranking an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Poncino v. Sierra Nevada Life & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. American Surety Co. v. School District No. 64Nebraska Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Wilmarth v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Coad v. London Assurance Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Hemlock 6400 Tire Co. v. McLemoreTennessee Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Idaho, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Gaumnitz v. Indemnity Insurance of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Detmer v. United Security Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Dirst v. Aetna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  5. Senn's Adm'x v. Michigan Mut. Liability Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API