Frash v. Eisenhower
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
—Robert Frash (Frash) appeals from a judgment awarding Ronald G. Eisenhower d/b/a Lakewood Realty (Lakewood) $5,000.00 as a commission for services rendered in bringing together Frash and Phil Jones (Jones), the ultimate purchaser of Frash’s property.
We reverse.
The facts upon which the trial court’s judgment is based are established by admissions made in Frash’s answer to Lakewood’s complaint and testimony elicited in plaintiff’s case-in-chief.
Frash did not present any evidence. Lakewood’s evidence is that Frash contacted Jim Grady, one of Lakewood’s agents, concerning the sale of property…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McMahan Const. Co. v. Wegehoft Brothers, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Barney v. Yazoo Delta Land Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Conley v. BrummitIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
- Ward v. PottsIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
- Bryan v. MayoIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Barrick Realty Co. v. BoganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Keithley's Auction Service v. Children of WrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- William S. Deckelbaum Co. v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Estate of Saemann v. Tucker RealtyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- Amato & Stella Associates, Inc. v. Florida North Investments, Ltd.District Court, D. Delaware · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.