Legal Opinion

At & T INF. SYS., INC. v. Cobb Pontiac-Cadillac, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 11, 1989No. 87-624, 87-648PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

553 So.2d 529 (1989)

AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.

v.

COBB PONTIAC-CADILLAC, INC.

COBB PONTIAC-CADILLAC, INC.

v.

AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., and Paul Roy.

87-624, 87-648.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

August 11, 1989.

Rehearing Denied November 9, 1989.

Sterling G. Culpepper, Jr. and W. Joseph McCorkle, Jr. of Balch & Bingham, Montgomery, for appellant/cross-appellee.

Roger S. Morrow and Joel H. Pearson of Morrow, Romine & Pearson, Montgomery, for appellee/cross-appellant.

HORNSBY, Chief Justice.

AT & T Information Systems, Inc. ("AT & T"), appeals from a judgment based on a jury verdict in the amount…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Houston; Per curiam; Concurrence · Houston.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bedwell Lumber Co., Inc. v. T & T CORP.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Padgett v. HughesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. Russellville Production Credit Ass'n v. FrostSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Coastal Concrete Co., Inc. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. George v. Federal Land Bank of JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Foremost Ins. Co. v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  2. Hicks v. Globe Life and Acc. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Chase Manhattan Bank v. Murphy (In Re Murphy)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  4. Harris v. M & S TOYOTA, INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. ALA. DEPT. OF CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCESSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API